Volume 4, 2026 – Issue 3 
The Development of Suffixal Construal among Moroccan Learners of English as a Foreign Language: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach
Mouhcine Zitouni
1* and Ahmed Ech-Charfi
2
Faculty of Education Sciences, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
* Corresponding author: mouhcine.zitouni@um5r.ac.ma
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23585207
Abstract
The acquisition of derivational suffixes is a very important aspect of language acquisition. This is especially true for English as a Foreign Language (EFL), as English is considered a highly derivational language. In line with the cognitive assumption that the meaning of a linguistic item includes the specific way its conceptual content is construed, this paper aimed to cross-sectionally examine the acquisition of the construal evoked by four suffixes: –ion, –al, –ment, and –ce. To this end, a three-task instrument (word formation, sentence completion, and interpretation tasks) was designed and administered to Moroccan EFL university students across four study levels: BA – S2, BA – S4, BA – S6, and MA – S2. Data analysis revealed several key findings. First, performance on the overall test differed among the groups, suggesting an effect of study level on the acquisition of suffixal construal. Group performance on the individual tasks showed an effect of study level in the word formation and sentence completion tasks, but performance on the interpretation task was rather similar. Furthermore, groups performed better on more frequent suffixes (–ion and –ment) than on less frequent suffixes (–al and –ce). It is concluded that the frequency of a suffix has an effect on the acquisition of its construal, providing practical implications for teaching.
Keywords: derivational suffixes, language acquisition, construal, cognitive linguistics, frequency, English as a Foreign Language
Published
2026/10/31
—
Section
Research Papers
How to Cite (APA)
Download Citation: EndNote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
References
Alotaibi, M. A., & Alotaibi, A. M. (2017). On the acquisition of derivational suffixes by Kuwaiti EFL learners. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(17), 223-238
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of memory and language, 62(1), 67-82
Baker, M. (1988). Morphological and syntactic objects: A review of Di Sciullo and Williams’ on the definition of word. In G. Booij & J. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 259-284). De Gruyter Mouton
Bauer, L. & Nation, P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253-279
Beard, R. (1981). The Indo-European lexicon: A full synchronic theory. North-Holland Publishing Company.
Beard, R. (1988). The separation of derivation and affixation: Toward a lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Quarderni di semantica, 5, 277-287
Beard, R. (1990). The empty morpheme entailment. In W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer & J. R. Rennison (Eds.), Contemporary morphology (pp. 159-169). Mouton de Gruyter
Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. State University of New York Press
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press
Booij, G. (2013). Morphology in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdal (eds), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–73). Oxford University Press
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive psychology, 43(1), 1-22.
Bowden, H. W., Gelfand, M. P., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Verbal inflectional morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A frequency effects study examining storage versus composition. Language Learning, 60(1), 44-87
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press
Bybee, J. L., & Beckner, C. (2009). 827 Usage-Based Theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 827–856). Oxford University Press
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169-190
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1-3), 83-121
Croft, W. (2009). Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395-420). John Benjamins Publishing
Croft, W. (2009). Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395-420). John Benjamins Publishing
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
De Pisapia, N., Repovš, G., & Braver, T. S. (2012). Computational Models of Attention and Cognitive Control. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (pp. 422-450). Cambridge University Press
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006). This turnip’s not for turning: Children’s morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling. British journal of developmental psychology, 24(3), 567-575
Dehham, S. H. (2015). The use of English adjectival affixes by Iraqi EFL learners: An error analysis. English Linguistics Research, 5(1), 14–31
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2014). Second language verb-argument constructions are sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(4), 405-431
Evans V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 3(2), 129–141
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(3), 282-295
Gerr, S. (1942). The Rational, Functional Language of Science and Technology. Philosophy of Science, 9(2), 146–161
Goldberg, A., (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press
Goodwin, A. P., Gilbert, J. K., & Cho, S. J. (2013). Morphological contributions to adolescent word reading: An item response approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 39-60
Hamawand, Z. (2011). Morphology in English: Word formation in cognitive grammar. Bloomsbury Publishing
Ikegami, Y. (2000). Nihongo-ron e shoutai [An invitation to theories of Japanese language]. Kodansha.
Janssen, N., & Barber, H. A. (2012). Phrase frequency effects in language production. PLoS ONE, 7(3)
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47-77
Jiang, N. (2002). Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 617-637
Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Viljanen, M. (2011). Influence of a Psychological Perspective on Scene Viewing and Memory for Scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1372-1387
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Morphing into adolescents: Active word learning for English‐language learners and their classmates in middle school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 47-56
Kimppa, L., Shtyrov, Y., Hut, S. C., Hedlund, L., Leminen, M., & Leminen, A. (2019). Acquisition of L2 morphology by adult language learners. Cortex, 116, 74-90
Kuo, L. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational psychologist, 41(3), 161-180
Langacker Ronald, W. (1987). Foundation of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 1). Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Langacker, R. W. (2002). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Walter de Gruyter Inc
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lehrer, A. (1995). Prefixes in English Word Formation. Folia Linguistica, 29(1-2)
Lehrer, A. (1996). Why neologisms are important to study. Lexicology, 2(1), 63-73
Lehrer, A. (2000). Are Affixes Signs?: The semantic relationships of English derivational affixes. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4, 143-154
Lehrer, A. (2003). Polysemy in derivational affixes. Trends In Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 142, 217-232
Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. University of Chicago Press
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How Languages Are Learned (5th ed.). Oxford University Press
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan
McCutchen, D., Logan, B., & Biangardi–Orpe, U. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s sensitivity to morphological information during word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 360-376
Nagy, W. E., Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(2), 155-170
Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 134–147
Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. (2002). The Roles of Metaphor and Metonymy in Nominals. In R. Dirven (ed.), The Metaphor-Metonymy Continuum: The Ongoing Debate, 279-319
Richards, B., Malvern, D., & Graham, S. (2008). Word frequency and trends in the development of French vocabulary in lower-intermediate students during Year 12 in English schools. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 199-213
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2008). Poverty-of-the-Stimulus and SLA Epistemology: Considering L2 Knowledge of Aspectual Phrasal Semantics. Language Acquisition, 15(4), 270–314
Rubin, H. (1991). Morphological knowledge and writing ability. In R.M. Joshi (Ed.), Written language disorders (pp. 43-69)
Schmiedtová, B. (2011). Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2?. Vigo international journal of applied linguistics, (8), 138-179.
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language learning, 48(2), 281-317
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 157-192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Stanojević, M. (2009). Cognitive synonymy: A general overview. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 193-200
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press
White, T. G., Power, M. A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 283-304
Yun, H., & Choi, S. (2018). Spatial semantics, cognition, and their interaction: A comparative study of spatial categorization in English and Korean. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1736-1776
Zhang, D. (2017). Derivational morphology in reading comprehension of Chinese-speaking learners of English: A longitudinal structural equation modeling study. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 871-89
About the authors
- Mouhcine Zitouni is an adjunct professor and doctoral researcher affiliated with the Faculty of Education Sciences at Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco. His academic interests lie in education, language studies, and pedagogical innovation. Through his teaching and research activities, he contributes to the advancement of educational practices and the development of scholarly research in the Moroccan higher education context.
mouhcine.zitouni@um5r.ac.ma
↩︎ - Ahmed Ech-Charfi is a Professor of Language Didactics at the Faculty of Education Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco. His research focuses on Arabic linguistics, sociolinguistics, language acquisition, multilingualism, and language policy in North Africa. He has authored numerous scholarly publications on Moroccan Arabic, language standardization, vocabulary development, and Arabic identity, and serves as a contributor to international research in linguistics and education.
a.echcharfi@um5r.ac.ma
↩︎


