Volume 4, 2026 – Issue 3 
Generative AI Acceptance among Moroccan Secondary School Students: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach
Youness Karouach
1*, Abderrahim Rharib
2, and Amina Azmi
3
ENCG, Hassan 2 University, Casablanca, Morocco
* Corresponding author: youness.karouach@gmail.com
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23584148
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly integrated into students’ learning, but evidence regarding its acceptance among secondary-school learners remains limited, particularly in North Africa. This study examined factors influencing Moroccan students’ intention to use GenAI through the core Technology Acceptance Model and exploratory open-ended questions. An Arabic online questionnaire was completed by 234 students attending urban secondary schools in Salé, Morocco, during April and May 2026. The model included perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, and behavioral intention and was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Reliability and convergent validity were satisfactory. All hypothesized relationships were significant. Perceived ease of use predicted perceived usefulness (β=.479) and attitude (β=.169); perceived usefulness predicted attitude (β=.597) and behavioral intention (β=.207); and attitude predicted behavioral intention (β=.449). The model explained 37.0% of the variance in behavioral intention. Open-ended responses highlighted explanation, idea generation, and time saving as benefits, alongside concerns about overdependence and inaccurate information. Perceived usefulness emerged as the main driver of favorable attitudes, which subsequently supported usage intention. Schools should combine purposeful integration with verification practices, ethical guidance, and age-appropriate artificial intelligence literacy.
Keywords: GenAI, technology acceptance model, secondary education, PLS-SEM, behavioral intention, Morocco
Published
2026/10/31
—
Section
Research Papers
How to Cite (APA)
Download Citation: EndNote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
References
Aksoy, D. A., & Akyel, A. K. (2026). Acceptance and usage patterns of generative artificial intelligence among higher education students. Educational Academic Research, 61, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1822770
Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H., & Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student perceptions of generative artificial intelligence: Investigating utilization, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Systems, 12(10), Article 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861
Common Sense Media, Hopelab, & Center for Digital Thriving. (2024). Teen and young adult perspectives on generative AI. Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://pz.harvard.edu/resources/teen-and-young-adult-perspectives-generative-ai
Contractor, Z., & Reyes, G. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Evidence from an elite college (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5392712). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5392712
Daher, W., & Hussein, A. (2024). Higher education students’ perceptions of GenAI tools for learning. Information, 15(7), Article 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15070416
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Digital Education Council. (2024). Digital Education Council global AI student survey 2024.
Farhane, H. (2025). ChatGPT in the eyes of learners: Perceived benefits, impacts, and challenges among Moroccan secondary school students. The International Journal of Technology, Innovation, and Education, 3(3), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17268638
Farinosi, M., & Melchior, C. (2025). To adopt or to ban? Student perceptions and use of generative AI in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 1684. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05982-7
Freeman, J. (2025). Student generative AI survey 2025. Higher Education Policy Institute: London, UK
Marengo, A., Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2025). Development and validation of generative artificial intelligence attitude scale for students. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1528455
Pedro, A., Dorotea, N., Ribeiras, C., & Azevedo, B. (2026). Use and acceptance of generative artificial intelligence in Portuguese higher education students. Sustainability, 18(7), Article 3209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073209
Rispler, C., Mashiach-Eizenberg, M., & Yakov, G. (2025). Understanding students’ perceptions of generative AI: Implications for pedagogy and graduate employability. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 16(1), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2025vol16no1art2084
Türk, N., Batuk, B., Kaya, A., & Yıldırım, O. (2025). What makes university students accept generative artificial intelligence? A moderated mediation model. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article 1257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03559-2
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: Investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Ventura, A. M. C. (2024). Unlocking the future of learning: Assessing students’ awareness and usage of AI tools. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(8), 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.8.2142
Xiaoyu, W., Zainuddin, Z., & Hai Leng, C. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in pedagogical practices: A systematic review of empirical studies (2022–2024). Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2485499. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499
About the authors
- Youness Karouach is a doctoral researcher at the National School of Business and management, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco. He is also a secondary-school physical education teacher. His research interests include sport management, physical education and related fields.
youness.karouach@gmail.com
↩︎ - Abderrahim Rharib is a professor and researcher the National School of Business and management, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco. His research interests include sport governance, sport management, economics and many related fields. He is an expert and he supervises doctoral research and contributes to academic research and scientific publication in these fields.
↩︎ - Amina Azmi is a PhD holder in Management Sciences, specializing in Sports Management. She is a Professor and University Researcher at the National School of Business and management, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco. Her research focuses on Sports Management, with particular interests in managerial, organizational, and strategic issues within the sports sector. Her academic activities encompass teaching, scientific research, and the development of knowledge in the field of sports management.
↩︎


